Toward the end of the eulogy, I said that I learned a lot from Asher, and that possibly the most important thing I learned was that when a person doesn't fit into frameworks, maybe the frameworks are wrong, not the person.
Every child teaches his or her parents how to be a parent for that specific child. There is no such thing as "father" and "mother" and "son" in the abstract sense. There are a couple of billion individual fathers, mothers, and sons, and each of them is unique. It took me a long time to learn how to be Asher's father - I'm not sure that I ever truly learned, but even though he's no longer alive, I can keep trying to learn.
I always adapted well to frameworks, until I finished university and had to step out of academic frameworks into real life. At that point I discovered that I couldn't cope with bureaucracies, which is why I've been self-employed for more than twenty-five years. It was difficult for me to have a son who never fit into schools. I wasn't brought up to question institutions, and I didn't go off to battle them on Asher's behalf when he got in trouble. Perhaps I should have. I always thought he should have been more adaptable, that he should have behaved better. Perhaps he should have.
But looking back on things, I wouldn't have wanted to have Asher any other way. If the schools couldn't accommodate a bright, talented, creative person like him, there was something deeply wrong with the schools. If his teachers were threatened by his originality and intensity, that shows their inadequacy as teachers.
We received a wonderful letter from a remarkable woman who was the principal of his school for a year, who remembered Asher's intense honesty and integrity with respect, even gratitude. If he had had more teachers like that, he would have fit in better.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment